ArticlePloS one2026
Ethnopharmocological study of medicinal plants used for treatment of skin diseases by herbalists in Northwestern region of Algeria.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluation of early antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSkin disease is a major public health concern worldwide, particularly in developing countries. Despite the rich diversity of medicinal plants and strong traditional healing practices in Algeria, the dependence on imported pharmaceuticals remains high. This study documents and analyzes traditional herbal knowledge related to the treatment of skin diseases in Northwestern Algeria (Mascara, Saïda, and Sidi Bel Abbès) with the aim to preserve and scientifically validate this ethnomedicinal heritage.
methodsA total of 117 herbalists (110 men and seven women) were interviewed using semi-structured questionnaires between September 2023 and July 2024. Data were analyzed using quantitative ethnobotanical indices, including the Relative Frequency of Citations (RFC) and Plant Part Value (PPV), to assess the cultural significance and usage frequency of medicinal species.
resultsA total of 73 plant species belonging to 29 families have been reported for the treatment of various skin ailments. The most abundant families were Lamiaceae, Asteraceae, Cucurbitaceae, Liliaceae, Cupressaceae, and Fabaceae. Allium sativum L. and Thymus vulgaris L. showed the highest RFC values (0.175 and 0.124, respectively). Leaves were the most frequently used plant parts (PPV = 0.48; 47.6%), followed by fruits (PPV = 0.12; 11.6%), and seeds (PPV = 0.09; 8.9%). Most of the remedies were prepared from dried plants (65.31%), powders (39.9%), and decoctions (22.55%) being the main preparation methods. Topical application (35.2%), poultices (30%), and rinsing (25%) were the most common modes of administration. The most frequently treated skin conditions were eczema, psoriasis, and acne.
conclusionsThis study highlights the remarkable ethnopharmacological knowledge preserved among herbalists in Northwestern Algeria, including women's traditional roles in medicinal practices. The documentation of these findings not only assists preserve valuable cultural heritage but also provides a foundation for future pharmacological research and the sustainable use of the rich medicinal flora of Algeria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.