ArticlePloS one2026
Coupling coordination between ecological environment quality and public health of residents in the Yellow River Basin, China: A modified coupling coordination model approach.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The continuous development of industrial technology has led to significant environmental pollution and climate change, both of which have severely impacted human health. Investigating the coupling coordination between ecological environment quality (EEQ) and public health of residents (PHR) is beneficial for enhancing public health and promoting sustainable development. This study uses panel data from 55 cities within urban agglomerations of the Yellow River Basin, China (YRBC) from 2011 to 2022 to construct evaluation index systems for both EEQ and PHR. The entropy method is first employed to quantify the development levels of these systems. Subsequently, a modified coupling coordination degree (CCD) model is applied to evaluate the coordination between the two systems. Furthermore, the study utilizes the Dagum Gini coefficient, Kernel density estimation, and Markov chains to analyze the spatiotemporal evolution of CCD. The Quadratic Assignment Procedure (QAP) is finally used to empirically test the factors influencing regional differences in CCD. The findings reveal that both EEQ and PHR levels in the YRBC exhibited an overall upward trend during the study period, although PHR showed declines in certain years. The CCD demonstrated a steady increase across the entire sample and within all three major regions. Analysis using the Dagum Gini coefficient indicates a narrowing disparity in CCD, with the Gini coefficient decreasing from 0.0617 in 2011 to 0.0536 in 2022. Kernel density estimation suggests that the CCD distribution curve has shifted rightward, becoming higher and steeper, indicative of reduced absolute differences in coupling coordination levels. QAP regression analysis reveals that factors such as regional disparities in per capita GDP significantly influence CCD regional disparities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.