ArticleArquivos de neuro-psiquiatria2026
Post-COVID cognitive dysfunction in socioeconomically-vulnerable older adults: findings from a Brazilian cohort.
Article in Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cognitive impairment is increasingly recognized as a long-term consequence of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), but most evidence comes from high-income settings. Little is known about its impact in socioeconomically-vulnerable populations.The current study investigated long-term cognitive effects in 133 individuals older than 50 years of age with low level of schooling and low socioeconomic status who were hospitalized for COVID-19.The participants were assessed 12 to 18 months after hospitalization using the Modified Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS-M). A subset of 65 participants underwent further cognitive and neuropsychiatric evaluations. Cognitive impairment was defined as scores ≤ -1.5 standard deviations from age- and education-adjusted Brazilian norms. During the acute phase of the disease, sociodemographic, clinical, and laboratory data were evaluated to identify potential risk factors.The mean age of the subjects (n = 65) was of 65.3 years, and the sample was composed of 69.2% of women, 57.1% of pardo individuals, 47.7% of subjects with ≤ 4 years of schooling, and 83.6% of participants with monthly family income ≤ 3 minimum wages. Hospitalization averaged 16.1 days, and 55.4% required intensive care. Cognitive impairment affected 70.8% of the participants. Higher age, female sex, and hyposmia were associated with cognitive impairment.Cognitive impairment was frequent in this socioeconomically-vulnerable sample, a group still underrepresented in existing research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.