ReviewThe Journal of nutrition2026
From Metabolism to Medals: Contemporary Perspectives and Revisiting Carbohydrate Guidelines for Fueling Endurance Athletes during Exercise.
Review in The Journal of nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- An extract from wholeJournal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition · 2026Trial
- Fuelled or Fooled? Examining the Evidence and Mechanisms Behind Ultra-High Carbohydrate Intake in Endurance Athletes.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Review
- Hitting the Wall in Marathon Running: An Integrative Psychophysiological and Durability-Based Review.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The effects of carbohydrate (CHO) intake on substrate metabolism, exercise capacity, and exercise performance have been studied for >100 y. From a metabolic perspective, the ergogenic effect of CHO intake is likely mediated by liver (and potentially muscle) glycogen sparing, maintenance of plasma glucose concentrations, and whole-body CHO oxidation rates, such that the required exercise intensity can be sustained for a longer duration thereby delaying fatigue. Accordingly, the 2016 sport nutrition guidelines from the American College of Sports Medicine recommend CHO intakes ≤90 g/h (from multiple-transportable CHOs, e.g., glucose/fructose mixtures), as targeted to exercise that is >2.5-3 h in duration. Although field observations report a trend for endurance athletes to consume (and experiment with) higher rates of CHO ingestion during training and racing (i.e., 120-200 g/h), the efficacy of such doses is not yet substantiated by current scientific research. Rather, contemporary research suggests that the upper limit of CHO intake could increase from 90 to 120 g/h (at least for trained participants), considering that both exogenous and whole-body rates of CHO oxidation can be increased with these higher ingestion rates. Such absolute doses may also modulate important physiological determinants of performance (e.g., durability and economy) across cycling, marathon running, and ultraendurance exercise. As such, the present paper provides a contemporary review of CHO metabolism during exercise, factors affecting exogenous CHO oxidation rates (i.e., CHO blend, ratio, format, environmental considerations, etc.) and sport-specific research (alongside personal author insights from practice), before presenting an updated and more nuanced model to guide CHO personalization strategies for endurance athletes. Directions for future research are also discussed, emphasizing the need for collaborative research to study both male and female athletes during ecologically valid exercise protocols that better address the real-world fueling challenges faced by elite athletes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.