ReviewEuropean heart journal2026
Heart failure in the elderly: epidemiology, mechanisms, and management.
Review in European heart journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- CHK1 activates mitophagy to attenuate cardiac aging via inhibiting AHSA1-ubiquitination.Redox biology · 2026Article
- Integrative Multi-Omics Profiling of Dynamic Body Mass Index-Systolic Blood Pressure Trajectories in Obesity for Precision Risk Stratification of Heart Failure Subtypes.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Prognostic Role of Immunonutritional Indices in Elderly Patients with HFpEF: Long-Term Follow-Up of the CONUT, PNI, and CALLy Scores.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There is no consensus on an age cut-off for being considered elderly, but the majority of patients with heart failure (HF) have an advanced age. The lifetime risk for developing HF is ∼25%, with a sharp increase in incidence after the age of 70. The lifetime risk for men and women is almost equal, but women exhibit a higher propensity towards developing HF with preserved ejection fraction, whereas men are more prone to HF with reduced ejection fraction. During the biological ageing process, several systemic and local pathophysiological alterations impact the myocardium, including impaired autophagy and proteostasis, mitochondrial dysfunction, and oxidative stress, as well as cellular senescence, clonal haematopoiesis of indeterminate potential, and chronic low-grade inflammation or inflammaging. Collectively, these changes compromise cardiac energy homeostasis and promote cell loss and dysfunction, increasing the risk of HF. Despite their relevance, these ageing-related mechanisms are hitherto not addressed by guideline-recommended medical therapy. Guideline-recommended medical therapy remains the cornerstone of HF treatment across age groups, including in elderly patients who tolerate it. However, a high burden of comorbidities and several features specific to advanced age, such as low blood pressure and frailty, often preclude full-dose guideline-recommended medical therapy. Similarly, the risk-benefit ratio of device therapies needs careful consideration in light of competing non-cardiac risks due to comorbidities that are prevalent in this population. Finally, HF is a mortal condition, and advanced care planning and end-of-life decisions should be discussed in a timely manner in elderly patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.