ArticleBMJ open respiratory research2026
Characterisation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in never-smokers and ever-smokers from a population-based cohort.
Article in BMJ open respiratory research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03049202 (BROnchoalveolar Investigations of Never-smokers With CHronic Obstructive Lung Disease From the Swedish CardioPulmonary bioImage Study), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
BROnchoalveolar Investigations of Never-smokers With CHronic Obstructive Lung Disease From the Swedish CardioPulmonary bioImage Study
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in never-smokers may have other clinical characteristics than tobacco smoking-related COPD. RESEARCH QUESTION: What are the risk factors, biomarkers, respiratory symptoms and health status in never-smoking individuals with COPD? STUDY DESIGN AND
methodsWe investigated never-smokers with COPD (n=154, mean age 60 years) from the population-based Swedish CArdioPulmonary bioImage Study (SCAPIS), and compared them with four control groups: never-smokers with normal lung function (n=281), current smokers with normal lung function (n=97), ex-smokers with COPD (n=103) and current smokers with COPD (n=55). COPD was defined as forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV
resultsThe never-smoker COPD group reported more respiratory symptoms and worse health status than never-smokers with normal lung function, but fewer symptoms, milder airflow limitation and better health status compared with ex-smokers and smokers with COPD. Never-smokers with COPD had more self-reported asthma. Moreover, never-smokers with COPD had higher Immunoglobulin E sensitisations to a mix of aeroallergens, higher geometrical mean FeNO levels and blood eosinophil counts than never-smokers with normal lung function. When participants with self-reported asthma were excluded, never-smokers with COPD still had more wheeze, cough and higher FeNO.
conclusionNever-smokers with COPD had more respiratory symptoms and elevated markers of type-2 inflammation, suggesting they might represent a distinct clinical phenotype which may differ from smoking-related COPD. They may therefore need to be treated and followed differently. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03049202.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.