ArticleScientific reports2026
Computational fluid dynamics-based flow field simulation and optimization of negative-pressure stone removal: stone size, position, and sheath geometry.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Research progress on treating urinary system stones using ureteroscopy combined With a negative-pressure suction sheath.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To investigate the flow field characteristics and optimize negative-pressure stone removal strategies using computational fluid dynamics (CFD). A three-dimensional CFD model integrating the UAS, flexible ureteroscope, urinary tract, and spherical stone fragments (1–3 mm) was developed. The low-Reynolds-number *k-ε* turbulence model was applied to simulate the steady, incompressible flow under varying negative pressures. Stone size, position, and sheath parameters significantly affected removal efficiency. 1 mm stones achieved a peak suction force of 0.54 N at 5 mm from the scope tip; 2 mm stones reached 1.68 N at 45 mm, with proximal 1–2 mm fragments experiencing repulsion. 3 mm stones generated the highest force (6.6 N) at 15 mm but showed “jumping” instability due to turbulence. Vortex shedding and low-pressure zones downstream of stones enhanced mobility. The 12/14Fr sheath balanced clearance efficiency and safety. This study revealed that stone size, distance from the scope tip and UAS geometry synergistically regulate clearance efficiency. The identification of a "high-efficiency clearance region" (5–15 mm) and optimal 12/14Fr UAS configuration provides actionable insights for clinical practice, while the proposed optimization framework offers a theoretical basis for next-generation UAS design and standardized negative-pressure stone retrieval protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.