ArticleScientific reports2026
Improving personalized recommendations system using graph attention networks driven by perceived complexity and innovation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper presents a product recommendation system (GAT-RS) based on perceived complexity and perceived innovation in product reviews. Perceived complexity refers to the usability of a product, while perceived innovation refers to the extent to which something looks novel. Such aspects significantly impact consumer dynamics and business performance indicators, including user engagement and sales results. In this study, product reviews are manually annotated, and then Explainable AI (XAI) is used to improve the decision-making process of the proposed GAT-RS model. The proposed model used pre-trained SimCSE embeddings to find high-quality textual representations of product reviews. It also used Graph Attention Networks (GAT) to discover the associations between the attributes of products and the perceptions of customers about complexity and innovation. The SMOTE oversampling on classes and loss class weights functions are used to handle the imbalance between reviews during training. The evaluation of the proposed GAT-RS is done on accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, ROC AUC, and the system was found to have a higher accuracy of 94.61% and a ROC AUC of 98.94% compared to the baseline approaches. A combination of complexity and innovation will enhance user satisfaction by aligning recommendations with preferred styles of cognition and novelty. The offered solution would also strengthen the accuracy of personalized recommendations based on customer interests.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.