ArticleCommunications biology2026
Reactive oxygen species-producing genes regulate mosquito midgut bacteria colonization, transcriptomic changes and cell repair.
Article in Communications biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Retracted
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The mosquito midgut uses ROS (Reactive Oxygen Species)-producing pathway to control midgut bacteria and maintain cell regeneration. However, it is not clear what are the functional and mechanistic differences between the two components, NOX (NADPH oxidase) and DUOX (Dual Oxidase) enzymes. In this study, we characterize the different roles of Nox and Duox gene in eliminating ECC15 (Erwinia carotovora 15) after oral infection and controlling the microbiome by counting CFU (Colony-forming unit) and 16S rRNA sequencing after RNA interference-mediated knockdown. We also determined the different transcriptomic changes by RNA-sequencing and cell regeneration by immunostaining after knocking down the genes upon ECC15 infection. Here, we report that Nox but not Duox was necessary for eliminating ECC15 and suppressed more rare species in the microbiome. Transcriptionally, we found that Nox controls more gene responses than Duox upon ECC15 infection; the heat shock protein pathway may be the main stress pathway induced by ECC15 that discriminates Nox (highly-related) and Duox. The MAPK pathway was robustly induced in control (LacZ) and Duox-knockdown mosquitoes, but not in Nox-knockdown mosquitoes. AMP gene induction was also suppressed only in Nox-knockdown mosquitoes. We also found that ECC15 infection induced strong cell regeneration, while Nox RNAi suppressed it strongly. Although, Duox was highly related to metalloexopeptidase activity genes comparing to Nox.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.