Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41760992›Full record

Observational studyThe patient2026

Preferences for Healthcare Delivery in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS): A Survey of Patients and Caregivers in the United States.

Ilene L Hollin, Hristelina Ilieva, Piera Pasinelli, Laura Chisholm, Terry Heiman-Patterson

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The patient, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ilene L HollinDepartment of Health Services Administration and Policy, Temple University Barnett College of Public Health, Philadelphia, PA, USA. ilene.hollin@temple.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-1405-8687
Hristelina IlievaWeinberg ALS Center, Vickie and Jack Farber Institute for Neuroscience, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8318-7533
Piera PasinelliWeinberg ALS Center, Vickie and Jack Farber Institute for Neuroscience, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3385-2707
Laura ChisholmDepartment of Neurology, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Terry Heiman-PattersonDepartment of Neurology, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9910-1041

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesAmyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a rapidly progressive and fatal neurological disease that leads to death within 2-5 years of diagnosis for more than 80% of people living with ALS (PLWALS). The American Academy of Neurology (AAN) developed practice parameters-general principles to guide clinicians in managing ALS-encouraging multidisciplinary care (MDC) but does not recommend specific healthcare delivery models. Three healthcare delivery models have evolved: a traditional model, a triage model, and a non-triage model. This study aims to describe preferences for and satisfaction with various models, among PLWALS and their caregivers (CALS), along with their perceptions of how their care aligns with AAN guidelines.

methodsA cross-sectional observational study utilizing a web-based survey was distributed via email to PLWALS and CALS. Three multi-assessment questionnaires were developed and tailored for PLWALS, CALS, and former CALS. Best-worst scaling (object case) data were analyzed using a best-minus-worst approach and descriptive statistics were calculated from means, t-tests and chi-square.

resultsThe combined sample included 378 respondents: 254 PLWALS (67.20%) and 124 CALS (32.80%; composed of 79 current caregivers [20.90%] and 45 former caregivers [11.90%]). The mean respondent age was 61.09 years (SD 11.1). The majority of the sample was white (92.86%), insured by Medicare (61.11%), and married/partnered (79.10%). Respondents preferred a non-triage model the most and a traditional model the least; 88.20% (CI: 84.92-91.49) were extremely likely to choose a non-triage model if given the choice and 83.12% (CI: 79.29-86.92) of respondents ranked non-triage as most preferred. A traditional model was ranked as the least preferred model in 75.28% (CI: 70.78-79.78) of respondents. The most important factors driving respondent preferences were ALS expertise and team-based care. Overall, respondents are satisfied with their care teams. PLWALS utilizing non-triage MDC models reported more adherence to quality care measures compared with those utilizing triage and traditional models. DISCUSSION: Respondent preference for non-triage models is consistent with the importance they place on the features of non-triage models. However, these findings should be understood in the context of our sample in which a large majority of respondents were receiving care via a non-triage model. To ensure ALS care delivery is patient-centered, practice parameters that aim to guide clinicians in managing ALS should provide more guidance to MDCs to deliver care aligned with patient preferences and values. Efforts should focus on sustainable financial models that can better facilitate non-triage models of care.

Indexed as

Amyotrophic Lateral SclerosisCaregiversDelivery of Health CarePatient PreferenceAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID41760992
PMCPMC13287296

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.