ReviewNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2026
The evolving landscape of amyloid-targeting therapies in Alzheimer's disease: progress and challenges.
Review in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Anti-Amyloid Antibodies in the Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease: An Umbrella Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Towards Structural Restoration: Epigenetic Reprogramming and Direct Astrocyte-to-Neuron Lineage Conversion as Next-Generation Regenerative Neurotherapeutics.Molecular neurobiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlzheimer's disease (AD) is the leading cause of dementia worldwide. Amyloid-β (Aβ) accumulation has long guided therapeutic development, though early β- and γ-secretase inhibitors failed to demonstrate clinical benefit.
methodsA narrative review was conducted based on a structured search of MEDLINE, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov, supplemented by manual screening of key reviews and Phase 3 trial reports on amyloid-targeting therapies.
resultsMonoclonal antibodies including aducanumab, lecanemab, and donanemab achieve significant amyloid clearance and modest slowing of cognitive decline in Phase 3 trials, validating amyloid reduction as a disease-modifying pathway. However, clinical benefits are limited, amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA) remain safety concerns, and high costs restrict accessibility. Persistent therapeutic gaps reflect the multifactorial pathology of AD, including tau, neuroinflammation, and vascular dysfunction.
conclusionsAmyloid-targeting therapies represent the first validated disease-modifying strategy for AD but are not definitive solutions. Future directions include earlier intervention, combination approaches, improved antibody design, and scalable biomarker implementation to enhance real-world impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41760995What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.