Evidence mapPaperPMID 41761012Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine2026

Automatic activation of neurostimulation for central sleep apnea results in high nightly usage.

Rami Khayat, Meena Khan, Timothy I Morgenthaler, Scott McKane, Robin Germany, Maria Rosa Costanzo

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01816776 (A Randomized Trial Evaluating the Safety and Effectiveness of the remedē® System in Patients With Central Sleep Apnea), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01816776 nacompletednot on this map

A Randomized Trial Evaluating the Safety and Effectiveness of the remedē® System in Patients With Central Sleep Apnea

TypeinterventionalSponsorRespicardia, Inc.Ran2013 to 2017Enrolled151ConditionsSleep Apnea, Central, Sleep Disordered Breathing, Heart FailureArmsTreatment Group (transvenous stimulation of the phrenic nerve), Control Group (Optimal Medical Therapy)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Reply to "Usage is not efficacy in transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation for central sleep apnea".Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rami KhayatPulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Penn State University, Hershey, PA, USA. rkhayat@pennstatehealth.psu.edu.
Meena KhanDivision of Pulmonary Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Timothy I MorgenthalerCenter for Sleep Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Scott McKaneZOLL Respicardia, Inc., Minnetonka, MN, USA.
Robin GermanyZOLL Respicardia, Inc., Minnetonka, MN, USA.
Maria Rosa CostanzoMidwest Cardiovascular Institute, Naperville, IL, USA.

Funding

ZOLL Respicardia, Inc. ZOLL Respicardia, Inc.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAdherence with mask-based therapies remains a significant challenge for patients with sleep-disordered breathing. Transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation (TPNS) to treat central sleep apnea (CSA) in adults offers a novel, automated approach to enhance nightly adherence by initiating therapy automatically based on patient-specific programmed conditions such as sleep schedule, activity, and body position. This retrospective analysis aims to determine the adherence achieved with TPNS’s automated activation approach.

methodsDevice data from 131 remedē®System Pivotal Trial participants were analyzed to calculate median daily hours of therapy within 14 days prior to visits. Therapy duration was defined as time when all conditions to activate therapy were met between the first-time therapy on to last time off during the night.

resultsMedian [Q1-Q3] nightly therapy duration at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months was 5.9 [4.9–6.6], 5.7 [5.0-6.8], 6.0 [5.3–6.8], and 5.9 [4.9–6.5] hours, respectively. Using a definition for adequate therapy as the percentage of patients with usage ≥ 4 h/night for 70% of nights, 86%, 82%, 83%, and 90% of patients met the criteria at these visits. Two patients (< 2%) discontinued treatment before 6 months for stimulation intolerance. Patients with adequate therapy reported more quality of life improvement.

conclusionAutomatic activation of TPNS therapy was associated with consistent use in over 80% of patients through 18 months. Higher usage may yield a greater overall reduction in CSA burden over the whole night compared to therapies requiring the patient to initiate the therapy. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT01816776 (21MAR2013) Current Knowledge/Study Rationale: Adherence to mask-based therapies has been a challenge. Usage and adherence of transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation therapy has a potential to be higher with automatic therapy activation when programmed conditions are met. Study Impact: The automatic activation of transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation therapy resulted in a higher duration of nightly usage and higher rate of adequate delivered therapy than generally are reported for mask-based therapies. High usage may yield a greater overall reduction in central sleep apnea burden over the whole night compared to therapies that require the patient to initiate the therapy, especially later in the night when CSA is more likely to occur.

Indexed as

Electric Stimulation TherapyPatient CompliancePhrenic NerveSleep Apnea, CentralAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPolysomnographyRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAdherenceCentral sleep apneaTransvenous phrenic nerve stimulation

Identifiers

PMID41761012
PMCPMC12994950

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.