ArticleBMC microbiology2026
Pooled feces reduce the inter-sample variation of microbiota in pig models.
Article in BMC microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFor in vitro batch fermentation or fecal microbiota transplantation, preparation of inoculum was recommended by pooled feces to minimize inter-individual variation. However, the impact of pooling on microbiota variability remains unclear. The present study investigated the changes in inter-sample variation of microbial community in fecal samples after pooling from different numbers of donors, and verified the hypothesis that the variation of microbiota in feces affects the fermentation outcomes in vitro using fecal inoculum.
resultsThe pooled feces from different pigs increased the microbial richness (Sobs and Ace indexes, P < 0.05). The PCoA indicated that the microbiota composition was not distinct among the treatments, however, the distance of the sample within group was reduced as the incremental number of feces in the mixed samples. Microbial composition analysis indicated the variation of microbiota abundance was reduced with the increasing number of feces in mixed samples. The in vitro fermentation results suggested that the coefficient variation (CV), especially inter-bath and total CV, the kinetic parameters of gas production, in vitro fermentability of dry matter (IVDMF), and SCFA production reduced as the number of mixture donors increased.
conclusionsCollectively, pooled feces originating from different donors can reduce the variation of microbiota between samples, and it is proposed that the fecal samples should be mixed, derived from 5 to 10 pigs, and then prepared as an inoculum to improve the reproducibility of in vitro fermentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.