ReviewExperimental physiology2026
Psychobiotics and the microbiota-gut-brain axis: Emerging paradigms in mental health modulation.
Review in Experimental physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Psychobiotics and the microbiota-gut-brain axis: Emerging paradigms in mental health modulation.Experimental physiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The global rise in mental health conditions has prompted interest in interventions that act beyond conventional psychopharmacology. Psychobiotics, broadly understood as live microorganisms or microbe-derived products that interact with the microbiota-gut-brain axis, have been suggested to exert neuroactive effects through neural, immune, endocrine and metabolic routes. This narrative review synthesizes recent preclinical, mechanistic and early clinical observations. Experimental studies show that selected strains can modulate cytokine signalling, influence stress-responsive systems such as the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, and support synaptic plasticity via factors such as brain-derived neurotrophic factor. A limited number of human trials using well-characterized Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium strains have reported improvements in affective and stress-related outcomes, but these effects are generally small to moderate, more apparent in adjunctive than stand-alone use, and dependent on strain, dose, population and intervention length (typically 4-12 weeks). Evidence on neurodevelopmental conditions (e.g., autism spectrum disorder, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder) remains preliminary, based on small and heterogeneous samples. Across studies, key constraints include methodological heterogeneity, incomplete strain-level reporting, and gaps in mechanistic resolution that make it difficult to link microbial shifts to psychiatric benefit. Emerging microbiome- and metabolomics-informed approaches may help identify likely responders and improve translational precision, but they are not yet ready for routine clinical application. Overall, psychobiotics should currently be viewed as a promising adjunct within integrative mental health care, warranting larger, standardized trials with clearly defined strains, doses and mechanistic endpoints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.