Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41762172›Full record

ReviewExperimental physiology2026

Psychobiotics and the microbiota-gut-brain axis: Emerging paradigms in mental health modulation.

Amir Arsalan Ghahari, Mehrdad Nourizadeh, Mehrdad SalekShahabi, Shaghayegh Davari, Saeid Mohammadzadeh Mounesyar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Experimental physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Amir Arsalan GhahariNeurosciences Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6476-5998
Mehrdad NourizadehNeurosciences Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-1347-9149
Mehrdad SalekShahabiDepartment of Medicine, TaMS.C., Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-5274-8178
Shaghayegh DavariNeurosciences Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3242-2688
Saeid Mohammadzadeh MounesyarNeurosciences Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7149-0289

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The global rise in mental health conditions has prompted interest in interventions that act beyond conventional psychopharmacology. Psychobiotics, broadly understood as live microorganisms or microbe-derived products that interact with the microbiota-gut-brain axis, have been suggested to exert neuroactive effects through neural, immune, endocrine and metabolic routes. This narrative review synthesizes recent preclinical, mechanistic and early clinical observations. Experimental studies show that selected strains can modulate cytokine signalling, influence stress-responsive systems such as the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, and support synaptic plasticity via factors such as brain-derived neurotrophic factor. A limited number of human trials using well-characterized Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium strains have reported improvements in affective and stress-related outcomes, but these effects are generally small to moderate, more apparent in adjunctive than stand-alone use, and dependent on strain, dose, population and intervention length (typically 4-12 weeks). Evidence on neurodevelopmental conditions (e.g., autism spectrum disorder, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder) remains preliminary, based on small and heterogeneous samples. Across studies, key constraints include methodological heterogeneity, incomplete strain-level reporting, and gaps in mechanistic resolution that make it difficult to link microbial shifts to psychiatric benefit. Emerging microbiome- and metabolomics-informed approaches may help identify likely responders and improve translational precision, but they are not yet ready for routine clinical application. Overall, psychobiotics should currently be viewed as a promising adjunct within integrative mental health care, warranting larger, standardized trials with clearly defined strains, doses and mechanistic endpoints.

Indexed as

BrainBrain-Gut AxisGastrointestinal MicrobiomeMental DisordersMental HealthProbioticsAnimalsHumansHypothalamo-Hypophyseal SystemPituitary-Adrenal Systemanxiety and depressionbrain‐derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF)Lactobacillus and Bifidobacteriummicrobiota–gut–brain axisneuroinflammationpsychobiotics

Identifiers

PMID41762172
PMCPMC13131092

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.