ArticleTechnology in cancer research & treatment
Robustness and Accuracy of Radiomics Models for Classifying IASLC Grading in Lung Adenocarcinomas: A Comprehensive Analysis of a Large Multicenter CT Database.
Article in Technology in cancer research & treatment. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ensemble machine learning classifiers based on computed tomography radiomics for predicting spread through air spaces in lung adenocarcinoma: a multicenter retrospective cohort study with transcriptomic interpretation.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Topologically distinct intratumoral heterogeneity scores for predicting high-risk pathological grades in invasive lung adenocarcinoma: A multicenter study across four institutions.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
IntroductionAccurate preoperative prediction of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) grading is crucial for developing individualized management and surgical strategies in lung adenocarcinomas (LUAD). Computed tomography (CT) radiomics serves as an important imaging biomarker for classification tasks in LUAD. However, the robustness and accuracy of radiomics models remain subjects of ongoing debate.MethodsIn this study, we conducted an analytical comparison of two critical steps in radiomics: dimensionality reduction and feature selection, aiming to differentiate between Grade 1 and Grade 2-3 tumors according to the preoperative IASLC grading system for LUAD. 1) For dimensionality reduction, we sequentially combined the T-test, Pearson correlation, and Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO), while considering principal component analysis (PCA) for comparison. 2) For feature selection, we utilized various machine learning (ML) techniques including Logistic Regression (LR), Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosting (GBC), XGBoost, Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LGBM), and Categorical Boosting (CatBoost). The diagnostic efficacy was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) and the corresponding area under the curve (AUC).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.