ArticlePrevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research2026
Leveraging Machine Learning to Understand the Link Between School Climate and Youth Substance Use: a Focus on Cannabis and Alcohol Use.
Article in Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper focuses on school climate indicators, which have been previously linked with aspects of students' well-being and school-related success, to explore how they relate to alcohol and cannabis use. We used machine learning (ML) approaches and leveraged data from a diverse sample of 69,513 students (45.4% White, 23.9% Black, 8.9% Latine) across 111 middle and high schools, with 12% (n = 7783) reporting cannabis use and 18.8% (n = 12,220) reporting alcohol use in the past 30 days. We focused on 154 items related to school climate, student attitudes and behaviors, and demographics. We employed a two-stage feature selection method, initially reducing the 154 features to 31, and subsequently to 20, for both alcohol and cannabis use. Alcohol and cannabis use shared 15 common features and 5 distinct features, though some variation occurred across these two outcome variables. We identified both unique and shared factors that best classified current users vs. non-users. Specifically, gender, sense of pride in the school, weapon carrying, and bullying others were unique indicators that best classified alcohol use. In contrast, difficulties overcoming challenges, problems controlling temper, and becoming angry easily were more strongly associated with cannabis use. Shared indicators associated with both substances included gang membership, skipping school, violent behavior, school-parent and school-student engagement, and gambling. The inclusion of diverse classification factors underscored ML's ability to capture complex social and environmental factors that may be associated with substance use differently across student demographics. These features were tested in 12 classification models for both substances, achieving ROC-AUC scores up to 86% with fine-tuning of the best-performing models. The results highlight the utility of ML for examining complex, multidimensional indicators associated with substance use that complement traditional models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.