ReviewThe journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease2026
Neuronal autoantibodies in neurodegenerative dementia: From evidence to clinical framework.
Review in The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stimuli-Responsive Aggregation-Induced Emission Materials for Tumor Theranostics: Design Strategies and Biomedical Applications.Small science · 2026Review
- The meningeal lymphatic vessel-peripheral immune axis: a novel therapeutic target in neurodegenerative diseases.Journal of neuroinflammation · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neuronal autoantibodies, including against neuronal surface receptors or intracellular antigens, are established pathogenic mediators and therapeutic targets in autoimmune encephalitis (AIE) and paraneoplastic neurological syndromes (PNS). These antibodies are now increasingly reported in patients with clinically diagnosed neurodegenerative dementia, prompting re-evaluation of a neurodegenerative etiology. Within neurodegenerative trajectories, whether such antibodies act as pathogenic drivers, non-causal markers, or immune modulators remains unresolved, and heterogeneous cohorts, assays, and endpoints limit inference and clinical translation. This review integrates current research at the intersection of autoimmunity and neurodegeneration and highlights accumulating evidence for a biological continuum. This model suggests that antibody-mediated mechanisms may extend beyond acute inflammation, with sustained exposure contributing to time-dependent neurodegeneration. To facilitate clinical translation, we advance a standardized diagnostic workflow comprising three sequential stages: (i) a pretest-probability triage that defines high-risk constellations prompting antibody testing, stratifies patients accordingly; (ii) a specimen-and-assay pathway for standardized testing workflow and structured interpretation of results; and (iii) post-test integrated analysis to adjudicate pathogenic relevance based on phenotype-antibody concordance. By bridging observational research to clinical decision-making, the framework supports identification of an immunologically modulated neurodegenerative subtype with potential for therapeutic intervention, while reducing false positives and avoiding non-essential immunotherapy in low-probability contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.