Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41763192›Full record

ReviewDrug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals2026

A review on integrated machine learning and deep learning driven artificial intelligence models for pharmacokinetics and toxicokinetics predictions, and their application.

Malarvannan M, Monohar S, Sanskruti Sitaram Kate, Isha Taneja, Swati Jaiswal, Bhupesh Pratap, Prakash C Rathi, Shikha Thakur, David Paul, Muhammad Wahajuddin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Unlocking the potential of rice bean (Journal of food composition and analysis : an official publication of the United Nations University, International Network of Food Data Systems · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Malarvannan MDepartment of Pharmaceutical Analysis, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER)-Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Monohar SDepartment of Pharmaceutical Analysis, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER)-Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Sanskruti Sitaram KateDepartment of Pharmaceutical Analysis, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER)-Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Isha TanejaTranslational PK/PD and Investigative Toxicology, Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine, Spring House, Pennsylvania.
Swati JaiswalCertara Predictive Technologies, Simcyp Division, Certara Inc, Radnor, Pennsylvania.
Bhupesh PratapResearch and Development, Rosemont Pharmaceuticals, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Prakash C RathiAugmented DMTA Platform, R&D IT, AstraZeneca, The Discovery Centre (DISC), Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Shikha ThakurSchool of Medical Science and Technology, Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Kharagpur, Kharagpur, West Bengal, India.
David PaulDepartment of Pharmaceutical Analysis, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER)-Kolkata, West Bengal, India. Electronic address: davidpaul@niperkolkata.ac.in.
Muhammad WahajuddinInstitute of Cancer Therapeutics, School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford, United Kingdom. Electronic address: m.wahajuddin@bradford.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of artificial intelligence (AI) tools and technology has made AI-driven drug discovery a more prominent field. We are firmly in the AI era, with hybrid designs that eventually comprise deep learning (DL) and conventional machine learning (ML). Although traditional models can predict ADMET (Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, Excretion, and Toxicity) properties, they remain relatively unsuccessful, and improving the accuracy of predictions remains challenging. Recently, several researchers have developed a hybrid learning model that successfully addresses these problems and improves prediction accuracy. The systematic tendencies facing AI-powered transformation from conventional DL and ML to hybrid learning AI models are examined in this review. Compared with traditional ML and DL, hybrid AI models have increased efficiency by reducing drug development time and costs, and improved success rates. In this context, the ongoing development of new ADMET software based on hybrid AI and multimodeling techniques can enhance the accuracy of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic predictions, improve ADMET endpoint predictions, and expedite the drug discovery of new chemical entities. Moreover, this review covers the future of AI in pharmaceutical sciences and ADMET predictions, including AI-driven prediction models that range from basic ML/DL to newly developed hybrid models, evaluation parameters, and their applications in ADMET property prediction. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The article covers the compilation of ongoing research in the development of ADMET (Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, Excretion, and Toxicity) software based on hybrid artificial intelligence and multimodeling techniques, which may increase the accuracy of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic predictions, improve ADMET endpoint predictions, and accelerate drug discovery.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDeep LearningDrug DiscoveryMachine LearningPharmacokineticsToxicokineticsAnimalsHumansPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsArtificial intelligenceDecision treesHybrid learning modelMachine learningMeta-learner modelToxicity

Identifiers

PMID41763192
PMCPMC13084680

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.