Evidence mapPaperPMID 41763264Full record

ArticleAppetite2026

Predicting structure- and control-based parental feeding practices among families with low-income: An ecological approach.

Jennifer M Barton, Sally G Eagleton, Ligia I Reyes, Rachel M Cole, Jennifer S Savage

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Appetite, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jennifer M BartonChild Health Research Center, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA. Electronic address: jvb6891@psu.edu.
Sally G EagletonDepartment of Epidemiology and Prevention, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, USA.
Ligia I ReyesDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Rachel M ColeChild Health Research Center, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Jennifer S SavageChild Health Research Center, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA; Department of Nutritional Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.

Funding

Penn State Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR002014 · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · 2025 to 2025
$3.8M
I: Penn State Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR002015 · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · 2025 to 2025
$554k
J: Penn State NRSA Training CoreTL1TR002016 · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · 2025 to 2025
$354k
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002015NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR002016NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Parental feeding practices (hereafter referred to as feeding practices) influence child weight outcomes, but few studies have identified which obesogenic risk factors shape their feeding practices using an ecological approach, especially among families with low-income. The goals of the current study were to examine the unique contribution of A) child appetitive traits, B) parent psychosocial factors, and C) home environment factors on parental use of structure- and control-based feeding practices. Parents of Head Start preschoolers (N = 253) completed measures of feeding practices, child appetitive traits, and parent psychosocial and home environment factors. Hierarchical regressions were used to test the ecological levels that contribute to feeding practices explained by child appetitive traits, and the additional variance contributed by parent psychosocial and home environment factors. Results indicate that 10% of the variance was explained for the structure super-factor, with the home environment explaining 3% over and above child appetitive traits and psychosocial factors. For control-based feeding, the total model accounted for 18% of the variance. Child appetitive traits explained most of the variance (14%) whereas the home environment did not predict any variance over and above appetitive traits and psychosocial factors. These findings underscore the need to consider multiple ecological levels to better understand the complex factors that shape how parents engage with their children during feeding opportunities and the potential impact on child growth and development.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorParentingPovertyChild, PreschoolFemaleHome EnvironmentHumansMaleParent-Child RelationsParentsAppetitive traitsEnvironmentFeeding practicesLow-incomeParentingPreschoolers

Identifiers

PMID41763264
PMCPMC13105390

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.