ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2026
Prevalence and Drivers of Missed Healthcare Appointments in Poland: Insights From a 2025 Survey.
Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Perceptions of public and private health services in Poland: findings from a 2025 nationwide survey.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Dietary supplement use for eye health in adults: knowledge, motivations, and consumption patterns in a nationwide sample of adults in Poland, 2026.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Employee expectations towards employer-provided workplace health promotion and mental health support: a 2025 cross-sectional survey.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Population-level evidence on lifestyle-related education and preventive services in primary care in Poland-a 2025 cross-sectional survey.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Missed appointments (patient no-shows) are a critical challenge undermining healthcare system efficiency globally. This study aims to characterize the patient no-show phenomenon in Poland, identify factors associated with missed appointments, and propose potential measures to reduce the no-show phenomenon in the Polish healthcare system. MATERIAL AND METHODS A nationwide cross-sectional survey was conducted using computer-assisted web interviews (CAWI) from August 1 to 4, 2025. The study used quota sampling stratified by sex, age, and residence to obtain a nationwide sample of 1162 Polish adults aged 18 to 96 years. A self-prepared questionnaire was used. RESULTS Among all respondents, 88.5% used healthcare services within the previous 12 months. Among healthcare users (n=1014), 14% missed appointments without cancellation. Forgetting appointments (42.3%) and communication barriers (27.5%) were identified as the primary reasons for no-shows. Text message (SMS) reminder systems received 62.5% support, while 67.5% endorsed the implementation of a penalty fee for public system non-attendance. Multivariable analysis revealed significantly (P<0.05) increased odds of no-shows among adults aged under 60 years of age, parents with children <18 years (aOR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.28-3.40), and individuals with moderate (aOR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.19-2.72) or poor financial status (aOR, 2.60; 95% CI, 1.47-4.60). CONCLUSIONS This study showed a relatively high prevalence of missed appointments in Poland. Young age, parental responsibilities, and economic constraints were associated with higher odds of no-shows. Findings support expanding digital notification systems and multi-channel communication infrastructure to reduce no-shows, rather than using punitive approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.