ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2026
Black parents' views and understanding of prenatal genetic testing: a cross-sectional survey of attitudes, knowledge and trust in UK healthcare.
Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Black women in the UK experience disproportionately poor maternal outcomes yet remain underrepresented in research on prenatal screening and diagnostic genetic testing (prenatal testing). We therefore know little about how Black parents feel and what they understand about these tests. Using a cross-sectional online survey, we assessed attitudes towards prenatal tests, knowledge of genetic terms and prenatal tests, and mistrust amongst Black and mixed Black heritage parents in the UK who had been pregnant in the last five years. 110 parents completed the survey (95% female). Screening was valued by most (89%), although only half (50%) reported willingness to undergo invasive diagnostic testing. Preparing for a child with a genetic condition or disability were key motivators for testing, whilst opposition to termination and concerns about miscarriage risk drove refusal. Healthcare professionals (HCPs) were the main source of information when discussing prenatal testing, though mistrust in healthcare systems was high and associated with lower reported uptake of both screening and diagnostic tests. Nearly three-quarters valued speaking to an HCP who shared their ethnic background. Misconceptions about sickle cell were common, with 40% believing it affects only African and Caribbean populations. While most parents recognised the term 'DNA', only 28% understood the term 'genome'. Our findings highlight support for prenatal testing but reveal knowledge gaps and high mistrust that may undermine informed choice. Addressing misconceptions - particularly around sickle cell and available prenatal tests - alongside culturally responsive counselling and community-based education is essential to achieving equitable prenatal care for Black parents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.