Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41764287›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2026

Black parents' views and understanding of prenatal genetic testing: a cross-sectional survey of attitudes, knowledge and trust in UK healthcare.

Michelle Peter, Clotilde Abe, Agnes Agyepong, Atinuke Awe, Rachael Buabeng, Melissa Dean, Jane Fisher, Sasha Henriques, Kerry Leeson-Beevers, Carol Nelson and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Michelle PeterNorth Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. michelle.peter@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-4977-8708
Clotilde AbeFive x More, London, UK.
Agnes AgyepongGlobal Child and Maternal Health, London, UK.
Atinuke AweFive x More, London, UK.
Rachael BuabengMummy's Day Out, London, UK.
Melissa DeanPatient and Public Involvement Group Member, London, UK.
Jane FisherAntenatal Results and Choices, London, UK.
Sasha HenriquesWellcome Connecting Science, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0009-0008-0422-6468
Kerry Leeson-BeeversAlström Syndrome UK, Torquay, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8826-5086
Carol NelsonPatient and Public Involvement Group Member, London, UK.
Shermel Walters-LawrencePatient and Public Involvement Group Member, London, UK.
Lyn S ChittyNorth Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Melissa HillNorth Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3900-1425

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Black women in the UK experience disproportionately poor maternal outcomes yet remain underrepresented in research on prenatal screening and diagnostic genetic testing (prenatal testing). We therefore know little about how Black parents feel and what they understand about these tests. Using a cross-sectional online survey, we assessed attitudes towards prenatal tests, knowledge of genetic terms and prenatal tests, and mistrust amongst Black and mixed Black heritage parents in the UK who had been pregnant in the last five years. 110 parents completed the survey (95% female). Screening was valued by most (89%), although only half (50%) reported willingness to undergo invasive diagnostic testing. Preparing for a child with a genetic condition or disability were key motivators for testing, whilst opposition to termination and concerns about miscarriage risk drove refusal. Healthcare professionals (HCPs) were the main source of information when discussing prenatal testing, though mistrust in healthcare systems was high and associated with lower reported uptake of both screening and diagnostic tests. Nearly three-quarters valued speaking to an HCP who shared their ethnic background. Misconceptions about sickle cell were common, with 40% believing it affects only African and Caribbean populations. While most parents recognised the term 'DNA', only 28% understood the term 'genome'. Our findings highlight support for prenatal testing but reveal knowledge gaps and high mistrust that may undermine informed choice. Addressing misconceptions - particularly around sickle cell and available prenatal tests - alongside culturally responsive counselling and community-based education is essential to achieving equitable prenatal care for Black parents.

Indexed as

Black PeopleGenetic TestingHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeParentsPrenatal DiagnosisAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPregnancyTrustUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID41764287
PMCPMC13342292

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.