ArticleScientific reports2026
Future-aware blood glucose forecasting using knowledge distillation with transformer-based sequence-to-sequence models.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate blood glucose level (BGL) forecasting is critical for diabetes self-management and clinical decision-making. Although deep learning models based on continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data have achieved encouraging results, most approaches rely exclusively on historical observations and cannot explicitly account for future disturbances, such as insulin delivery and meal intake, that are unavailable at deployment. To address this limitation, we propose a future-aware learning framework for multi-step BGL prediction that leverages privileged information during training while preserving deployability at inference. A Transformer-based teacher model is trained offline using both historical CGM data and future disturbance information to learn disturbance-aware temporal representations. A student model with a similar sequence-to-sequence structure is then trained using knowledge distillation to approximate the teacher's representations based solely on historical inputs, enabling real-time forecasting without access to future data. The proposed framework is evaluated on the publicly available OhioT1DM and AZT1D datasets for prediction horizons ranging from 30 to 120 minutes and compared with several established methods. The results show consistent reductions in root mean squared error and mean absolute error, together with improved clinical reliability as assessed by Clarke error grid analysis, with over 90% of predictions falling within clinically acceptable regions. These findings demonstrate the potential of future-aware training strategies to enhance glucose forecasting performance under realistic deployment constraints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.