ArticleScientific reports2026
Brain structural correlates of individual differences in heartbeat counting and discrimination: A voxel-based morphometry study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Individual differences in interoception have drawn attention because of their relevance to emotion-processing abilities and mental health. To assess individual differences, researchers have employed methods using cardioception, including the heartbeat counting task (HCT), where participants count their heartbeat for a certain duration, and the heartbeat discrimination task (HDT), where they judge whether presented tones with various delays to the R-peak are synchronized with their heartbeats. However, the processes and neural substrates underlying individual differences in cardiac interoception remain unknown. Based on our hypothesis that these tasks recruit fronto-insular brain regions, we investigated the neuroanatomical substrates underlying individual differences in HCT and HDT indices by conducting voxel-based morphometry analyses using brain structural images of 138 participants who underwent both tasks. HCT-derived interoceptive accuracy (IAcc) was positively associated with gray matter volume (GMV) in the left frontal pole, whereas an HDT index, reflecting response consistency across different delay conditions, was positively associated with the GMV of the left orbitofrontal cortex and right posterior insula. Conversely, the correlation between accuracy and confidence in the HCT, defined as interoceptive awareness, was associated with GMV, including the left posterior insula. These variations in the brain regions may reflect differences in the demands of the HCT and HDT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.