ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2026
Towards Meaningful Consumer and Community Involvement in Health Research: A Qualitative Study of Consumer and Researcher Experiences.
Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adapting a mental health program for people with multiple myeloma and smouldering myeloma: a consumer-informed feasibility study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- From tokenism to togetherness: the V.O.I.C.E. framework for safety-centred lived experience involvement in perinatal and parenting research.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Article
- Improving the Accessibility of Consumer Orientation: Co-Designing Infection Control Training for Consumers Partnering With Health Services.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundConsumer and community involvement (CCI) in health research is recognised as an essential component of ethical, effective and relevant research practice. While the recommended principles that enable high-quality CCI are well established, consistent implementation remains a challenge.
objectiveTo inform consumer involvement strategies and practices, this study explored the experiences of researchers and consumers involved in CCI in research at a large metropolitan health service precinct in Brisbane, Australia.
methodsSemi-structured interviews were used to explore participants' experiences of CCI. Researchers and consumers who had undertaken CCI activities were purposively sampled from two hospitals and six research institutes. Thematic analysis using the framework method was employed to interpret the data. Coding was conducted both inductively and deductively, utilising a data-driven approach guided by the study's objectives.
resultsA total of 27 participants contributed (researchers, n = 17; consumers, n = 10). Five themes captured supportive and challenging elements of CCI and participants' visions for meaningful CCI in research. Themes included 'Laying the Groundwork', which reflects the foundational elements needed for meaningful partnering, and 'Navigating the Human Factor', which captures the interpersonal dynamics that shape CCI. 'Bridging Methods' described methodological approaches to CCI. Participants' challenging experiences with organisational structures and culture were represented by 'Opportunities: Organisational Barriers', while 'Paving the Way Forward' pointed to practical strategies for embedding CCI meaningfully and sustainably into research processes.
conclusionThis study shows that while CCI in health research is highly valued, it faces challenges like organisational barriers, administrative load and limited support. Meaningful CCI depends on early relationship building, role clarity, flexible processes and culturally safe, trauma-informed practices. To turn policy into action, research-active health services must streamline systems and create structures for long-term, inclusive involvement. Researcher training should cover CCI principles, as well as interpersonal and facilitation skills crucial for building successful and meaningful involvement partnerships. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This study benefited from the involvement of a health consumer partner (J.M.) throughout all stages of the research. Our consumer partner contributed to (1) drafting the initial grant proposal; (2) developing the research protocol, methods and processes; (3) research governance meetings; (4) the design and refinement of interview guides to ensure relevance and clarity of questions; (5) providing feedback in the form of sense checking developing themes to refine interpretation of findings; and (6) critically reviewing and providing feedback on manuscript drafts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.