ArticleBMC public health2026
Work ability and associated factors among individuals with Post COVID-19 condition- a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Factors influencing work ability and return-to-work in individuals affected by post-COVID: a systematic review.BMC public health · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeLong-standing symptoms have been reported after COVID-19 infection, which can negatively impact daily life and work. The purpose of this study was therefore to describe work ability and explore factors associated with poor work ability among individuals with Post COVID-19 Condition (PCC).
methodsWe did an online survey among individuals with self-reported PCC. Descriptive statistics and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to explore relationships between different factors associated with poor work ability.
resultsA total of 608 individuals answered the survey (mean age 47.3 years (SD 9.9), 87% women). The majority (85%) had not been hospitalized on account of a COVID-19 infection. Work ability was experienced as poor among 51%, but only 18% were on sick leave. In the final logistic regression model of four variables (Nagelkerke R Square 0.538, p < 0.001), mental fatigue was the most important factor for perceived poor work ability (Odds ratio 1.176; CI 95%: 1.123–1.232 p < 0.001, Nagelkerke R Square 0.406). Higher levels of dependency in Activities of Daily Living (ADL), greater physical fatigue, and impaired balance were also associated with self-reported poor work ability.
conclusionPerceived poor work ability is common among people with PCC. Several factors are associated with poor work ability in this population whereof mental fatigue seems to be strongest. Given the complexity of these conditions and the consequences in everyday life, it is crucial to implement individually tailored interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.