Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41764442›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026

Dose-response relationship between early pregnancy blood pressure and gestational diabetes mellitus based on propensity score matching: a retrospective study.

Rongrong Han, Yanqiang Guo, Minqiang Zhang, Jinhua Pan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rongrong Han *Department of chronic disease control, The Center for Disease Control and Prevention (Health Supervision Institute) of Linping District, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 311100, China.
Yanqiang Guo *Department of comprehensive control and management, The Center for Disease Control and Prevention (Health Supervision Institute) of Linping District, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 311100, China. 18058733157@163.com.
Minqiang ZhangDepartment of Public Health, The East Lake street community health service center of Linping District, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 311100, China.
Jinhua PanDepartment of Ultrasound Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310000, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a common pregnancy complication with substantial short- and long-term consequences for mothers and offspring. Whether modest elevations in blood pressure (BP) during early pregnancy are associated with GDM risk, particularly in a dose-response fashion, remains unclear. We examined the association between early pregnancy BP and GDM in a Chinese community-based cohort using propensity score matching (PSM) and restricted cubic spline (RCS) analyses.

methodsThis retrospective study included 11,338 pregnant women who registered for antenatal care in 2020 at eight community health service centers in Linping District, Hangzhou. All women underwent a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test at 24–28 gestational weeks and were classified as having GDM (n = 1,212) or not according to the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups criteria. Early pregnancy BP, measured at the first antenatal visit (< 13 gestational weeks), was categorized into low, normal and high groups based on the 10th and 90th percentiles of the BP distribution. PSM (1:3 nearest-neighbor matching without replacement, caliper 0.2) was applied to balance gestational age at registration, residence, parity and cesarean section history between GDM and non-GDM groups. Conditional logistic regression and RCS models were then used in the matched cohort to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and characterize dose-response relationships between systolic BP (SBP), diastolic BP (DBP) and GDM risk.

resultsOverall, 1,212 (10.69%) women developed GDM. PSM yielded a matched cohort of 1,212 women with GDM and 3,636 without GDM, with all standardized mean differences for matching covariates below 0.10, indicating excellent baseline balance. In this emulated case-control setting, conditional logistic regression further adjusted for maternal age, early pregnancy body mass index and number of previous abortions showed that women in the high BP group had more than twice the odds of GDM compared with those in the low BP group (adjusted OR = 2.14, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.26–3.63). RCS analyses revealed a linear dose-response relationship between SBP and GDM (P-overall < 0.001, P-nonlinear = 0.232), with the odds of GDM increasing by 10% for every 10 mmHg increase in SBP (OR per 10 mmHg = 1.10, 95% CI: 1.03–1.17), and a nonlinear association for DBP (P-overall < 0.001, P-nonlinear = 0.008), with risk rising when DBP exceeded 80 mmHg. Associations were broadly consistent across all subgroups.

conclusionsElevated BP in early pregnancy is independently associated with an increased risk of GDM. By combining PSM with RCS modeling, this study demonstrates that even modest BP elevations, including values near the conventionally normal range, are linked to higher GDM risk. Early pregnancy BP may therefore serve as a simple, routinely available marker for identifying women at high risk and informing early prevention strategies for GDM.

Indexed as

Blood PressureDiabetes, GestationalAdultChinaFemaleGestational AgeGlucose Tolerance TestHumansLogistic ModelsPregnancyPregnancy Trimester, FirstPropensity ScoreRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsBlood pressureDose-response relationshipEarly pregnancyGestational diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID41764442
PMCPMC13059241

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.