ArticleBMC health services research2026
Risk stratification for long-term inpatient costs in mental disorders: a dual-track machine learning approach using baseline EHRs and hospitalization trajectories.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMental disorders (MDs) impose substantial long-term inpatient costs, yet existing prediction models rarely account for dynamic hospitalization trajectories or diagnostic heterogeneity. This study developed and validated a dual-track machine learning framework integrating baseline features with trajectory-derived patterns to predict three-year cumulative hospitalization costs for patients with MDs in China.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study using electronic health records from 3,396 adults with first admission to a psychiatric hospital (2017–2018) and three‑year follow‑up. State sequence analysis and hierarchical clustering identified distinct hospitalization trajectory patterns. Ten baseline variables available at index admission (Set A) and trajectory cluster membership (Set B) were used to train five regression models with stratified 70:30 split and five‑fold cross‑validation. Performance was evaluated using R², RMSE, and MAE on log‑transformed costs. SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) analysis was applied to interpret the optimal model and examine diagnostic heterogeneity.
resultsFour distinct trajectory patterns were identified: low‑frequency short‑stay (64.7%), high‑frequency short‑stay (10.0%), long‑term intermittent (4.8%), and long‑term continuous (20.5%). The gradient boosting machine (GBM) achieved the best test performance using Set A (R² = 0.35), significantly outperforming linear regression (R² = 0.33) and random forest (R² = 0.31). Adding trajectory clusters (Set B) increased R² to 0.71 (ΔR² = 0.36), indicating strong association between long‑term hospitalization patterns and cumulative costs, though this component is only retrospectively explanatory. SHAP identified Payment methods, aCCI, Diagnosis groups, and Age as dominant cost drivers. Model performance was stable for the F2 group (61.8% of cohort) but markedly lower for rare diagnostic subgroups (F0, F1).
conclusionsRisk stratification for three‑year cumulative hospitalization costs is feasible using only routine baseline information from first admission. The proposed dual‑track framework separates prospective prediction from retrospective explanation, providing a methodologically sound tool for institutional resource planning and high‑risk screening in mental health settings. Future work requires external validation and implementation studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.