ArticleBMC infectious diseases2026
Could home management of COVID-19 cases alleviate strain on the fragile healthcare system in Damascus, Syria: a prospective cohort study.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- High frequency of antibiotic administration for COVID-19 patients in Syria and its associations with mortality and complications.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Observational
- Forecasting COVID-19 inpatient mortality using fundamental parameters in resource-constrained settings: a countrywide multi-center cohort study.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The global impact of COVID-19 was devastating, particularly in low-income countries. Conflict zones like Syria, already plagued by political and socioeconomic instability, faced additional hardships, resulting in a fast collapse of the healthcare system. The overwhelmed system necessitated the implementation of home-based management as a practical solution to alleviate strain on hospitals. This study documents the efforts of a volunteer team during the initial COVID-19 wave in Damascus, Syria (August-September 2020) in implementing management through 770 home visits and evaluates its outcomes in terms of recovery, hospitalization, and mortality three weeks after. Out of the moderate and severe cases managed, 81.4% (n = 276) reported full or partial recovery, with only 6.6% (n = 19) persistently experiencing low peripheral blood oxygen levels at follow-up. Nonetheless, 97 patients (28.6%) necessitated hospitalization, 49 (14.5%) were admitted to intensive care units, and 52 (15.3%) died. Age, male gender, and cardiac comorbidities were associated with a higher need for oxygen support and led to higher hospitalization and mortality rates. These home visits effectively steered most patients toward recovery and facilitated the timely identification and management of critical cases until their transition to hospital care when capacities allowed, proving to be a significant asset to the healthcare system in the face of such challenging circumstances.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.