ArticleAlzheimer's research & therapy2026
Automated high-throughput quantification of plasma p-tau217 and APOE-ε4 for Alzheimer's disease diagnosis and cognitive decline in a memory cohort.
Article in Alzheimer's research & therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Biomarker-Based Diagnosis and Care Pathways for Alzheimer's Disease in the Era of Disease-Modifying Treatments: A Consensus Statement by Belgian Experts.European journal of neurology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBlood-based biomarkers could improve the precision of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) clinical diagnosis and expand access to targeted treatments. Therefore, we evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of plasma Elecsys p-tau217 (Roche) and compared it with Elecsys p-tau181 (Roche) and Lumipulse p-tau217 (Fujirebio). We also assessed the added value of APOE-ε4 carrier status, plasma Aβ42 and Aβ42/40 in a memory-clinic cohort and evaluated associations with longitudinal cognition. MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 187 patients from the Cognitive Centre Ghent University (CCUG) biobank, classified as AD (n = 103) or non-AD cognitive disorders (n = 84) based on CSF biomarkers (CSF Aβ42/40 ratio, total tau and p-tau181), were included. Plasma Elecsys p-tau181, p-tau217, and APOE-ε4 were measured on the Roche cobas® pro e801, and p-tau217, Aβ42, and Aβ40 on the Fujirebio LUMIPULSE G1200. ROC analyses and single- and two-cut-off strategies (95% sensitivity/specificity) were applied. Subgroup analyses examined APOE-ε4 status, renal function, cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) features, Fazekas score, and longitudinal cognition.
resultsElecsys plasma p-tau217 showed high discriminative performance for AD versus non-AD (AUC 0.939), comparable to Lumipulse p-tau217 (AUC 0.950; p = 0.485). Elecsys p-tau181 performed lower than Elecsys p-tau217 (AUC 0.903; p = 0.043). Using a two-cut-off strategy, the intermediate proportion was 19.9% for Elecsys p-tau217, 11.9% for Lumipulse p-tau217, and 33.2% for Elecsys p-tau181. Adding APOE-ε4 to Elecsys p-tau217 improved discriminative performance (AUC 0.970, p = 0.02) and reduced intermediates to 11.0%. Adjustment for Aβ42 on the Fujirebio platform did not significantly increase the AUC (0.950 vs. 0.957; p = 0.322) and modestly reduced intermediate classifications (11.9% to 10.0%). Higher baseline Elecsys p-tau217 was associated with lower baseline MoCA and a trend towards faster MoCA decline (p = 0.07). Age, sex, renal function, Fazekas score, and CAA were not significantly associated with Elecsys p-tau217 concentrations.
conclusionPlasma Elecsys p-tau217 measured on an automated high-throughput platform shows excellent diagnostic accuracy for AD. Incorporating APOE-ε4 further improves classification, while Aβ42 adjustment had only limited additional impact. Baseline p-tau217 also reflects cognitive severity and may relate to subsequent cognitive decline in the memory-clinic setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.