ReviewJournal of cardiothoracic surgery2026
Aortic dissection: the role of macrophages in disease pathogenesis and their potential as a treatment target.
Review in Journal of cardiothoracic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aortic dissection (AD) is a life-threatening cardiovascular emergency characterized by an intimal tear that allows blood to enter the medial layer of the aortic wall, creating a false lumen. This process separates the layers within the media and may extend longitudinally along the aorta, sometimes progressing to aortic rupture if not promptly managed. Patients often present with sudden and severe chest, back, or abdominal pain, and clinical manifestations vary depending on the location and extent of the dissection. The underlying mechanisms of AD remain incompletely understood, but emerging evidence suggests that immune cell activation, particularly macrophage-mediated inflammation, plays a critical role in disease initiation and progression. Existing evidence indicates that macrophages polarize toward the classic (M1) phenotype, releasing proinflammatory cytokines and matrix-degrading enzymes that exacerbate vascular injury. Conversely, type 2 macrophages (M2) are activated in response to M1 macrophage exhaustion and other regulatory signals, exerting anti-inflammatory and tissue-repair functions. Therefore, M2 macrophages may represent a promising molecular target for therapeutic intervention. Macrophage infiltration also contributes to vascular smooth muscle cell phenotypic switching, endothelial dysfunction, and extracellular matrix degradation. In this review, we discuss the role of macrophages in the pathogenesis of AD, summarize their involvement in key pathological processes, and highlight molecular signaling pathways linking macrophage activation to AD development. Furthermore, we explore the therapeutic potential of modulating macrophage polarization as a strategy for AD treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.