ArticleBMC global and public health2026
Mortality risk during the COVID-19 pandemic is shaped by human development.
Article in BMC global and public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mortality risk during the COVID-19 pandemic is shaped by human development.BMC global and public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDuring the global COVID-19 pandemic (2020-2021), excess mortality varied substantially across countries. Notably, upper-middle-income countries experienced greater variability in excess mortality than both low- and high-income countries, despite reporting fewer COVID-19 cases than high-income countries but more than low-income countries. This disconnect between case numbers and mortality suggests more complex structural vulnerabilities. Socioeconomic conditions and healthcare system performance, collectively referred to as National Framework Conditions (NFCs), are likely key determinants of pandemic outcomes. However, the specific relationship between these factors and excess mortality remains poorly understood.
methodsWe constructed a predictive model of excess mortality using reported COVID-19 case counts and a wide array of NFCs derived from the World Development Indicators (WDI), employing a tree-based machine learning method (XGBoost). To reduce dimensionality, we applied a non-linear method (e-Isomap), extracting latent components called compressed National Framework Conditions (cNFCs). We applied SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values to estimate the feature importance and quantify the contribution of each cNFC.
resultsOur machine learning model explained nearly half of the global variance in excess mortality (
conclusionsOur findings demonstrate that cNFCs outperform conventional epidemiological or preparedness metrics, in explaining cross-country differences in COVID-19 excess mortality during 2020-2021. By capturing latent socioeconomic structures, the cNFC framework reveals systemic vulnerabilities that reported COVID-19 cases and other indicators fail to detect. This approach offers a new perspective on structural resilience and pandemic preparedness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.