ArticleEcho research and practice2026
Transient cavity dilatation during supine exercise bicycle stress testing: mechanistic insights.
Article in Echo research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCavity dilatation is occasionally observed during supine bicycle exercise stress echocardiography (SBSE). The underlying mechanisms are poorly understood.
aimsThis study aimed to characterise patients with left ventricle (LV) cavity dilatation and a decrease in the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) during SBSE.
methodsA total of 653 patients who underwent SBSE were evaluated. Those with exercise-induced cavity dilatation (defined as increased cavity size and a decrease in LVEF) were evaluated (n = 29). A control group (n = 37) of patients with a hypertensive response and a normal ESE was also evaluated.
resultsA total of 33/653 (5.1%) patients had an abnormal LV cavity response to exercise, with 15/29 (51.7%) having significant underlying coronary artery disease (CAD). Comparisons were made between patients with CAD (n = 15) and those with nonobstructive coronary arteries (NCAs, n = 14). NCA patients had significantly higher peak diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (NCA-CD 109 ± 17 mmHg vs. CAD-CD 96 ± 16 mmHg, p = 0.044) and rate-pressure product (RPP) (NCA-CD 28,623 ± 4474 vs. CAD-CD 23,649 ± 4763, p = 0.007). There was a trend toward increased dyspnoea at peak exercise in NCA (NCA-CD 35.7% vs. CAD-CD 6.7%, p = 0.080), and CAD patients showed a higher observed frequency of severe chest pain (CAD 53.3% vs. NCA 14.3%, p = 0.050). When patients with NCA and cavity dilatation were compared with a control group of patients with a hypertensive response to exercise but no cavity dilatation, no significant differences were observed.
conclusionCavity dilatation is observed in 5% patients undergoing SBSE and is attributable to significant CAD in approximately half of patients. NCA cavity dilatation is associated with increased RPP and DBP at peak exercise, with a trend toward increased dyspnoea. Severe chest pain at peak exercise was observed more frequently in CAD patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.