ReviewLasers in medical science2026
An Overview of the Mechanisms of Fractional CO
Review in Lasers in medical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparative efficacy and safety of fractional carbon dioxide and erbium-based fractional lasers for atrophic acne scars: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Lasers in medical science · 2026Pooled it
- Transcriptomic responses of skin to different micro-injury modalities: fire filiform needling, ablative fractional COLasers in medical science · 2026Article
- Clinical application of 10 600 and 1540 nm laser therapy in post-burn functional impairment: a case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review aims to investigate the mechanisms underlying the application of ablative fractional CO2 laser in scar treatment and analyze its effects on inflammatory responses, cell proliferation and collagen remodeling during wound healing. It focuses on how the fractional CO2 laser promotes skin repair by modulating molecular mechanisms, thereby effectively improving scar appearance. This review summarizes numerous clinical and experimental studies on ablative fractional CO2 laser treatment, focusing particularly on its regulatory effects on immune cells, fibroblasts, matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), heat shock proteins (HSPs), microRNAs (miRNAs), and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) at various stages of repair. The findings demonstrate that ablative fractional CO2 laser significantly improves scars through precise thermal damage and modulation of the tissue repair. Specifically, by precisely regulating key factors such as MMPs, TGF-β, HSPs, miRNAs, and bFGF during the tissue repair phases, it promotes re-epithelialization, neovascularization, and the synthesis and orderly deposition of collagen, thereby balancing antifibrotic and pro-repair effects to improve scar texture and function. The fractional CO2 laser is an effective modality for scar treatment that promotes scar resolution and wound healing through dynamic regulation. It demonstrates significant clinical efficacy for both atrophic and hypertrophic scars, offering new perspectives and approaches for future scar management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.