Evidence mapPaperPMID 41766626Full record

ReviewBJPsych open2026

Antidepressant prescribing trends for adult patients in the UK and Ireland during the COVID-19 pandemic: systematic review.

Meghann Jones, Eva M Krockow, Samuel J Tromans, Elizabeta B Mukaetova-Ladinska

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BJPsych open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Meghann JonesSchool of Psychology and Vision Sciences, https://ror.org/04h699437University of Leicester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-8143-2201
Eva M KrockowSchool of Psychology and Vision Sciences, https://ror.org/04h699437University of Leicester, UK.
Samuel J TromansAdult Learning Disability Services, Leicestershire Partnership NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0783-285X
Elizabeta B Mukaetova-LadinskaSchool of Psychology and Vision Sciences, https://ror.org/04h699437University of Leicester, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent decades have seen a steady increase in antidepressant prescribing, but little is known about prescribing trends during and following the COVID-19 pandemic.

aimsThis preregistered systematic review, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, aimed to investigate antidepressant prescribing trends for adults in the UK and Republic of Ireland during and after the pandemic. It also compared prescriptions by drug and location.

methodWe searched six databases: APA PsycInfo, CINAHL, MEDLINE, Scopus, medRxiv and Preprints.org. The review included primary research articles reporting trends in antidepressant prescriptions, including at least one time point after March 2020 in the UK and Republic of Ireland. This review has been preregistered on PROSPERO (ID: CRD42024498503).

resultsWe identified 7,320 studies, of which ten met the search criteria for the review. Studies were grouped on the basis of time period (2020:

conclusionsThe commonly reported increase in antidepressant prescribing corroborates pre-pandemic trends and may suggest further, increased demands for mental health support to meet the unique challenges of the pandemic. Future research is required to evaluate the appropriateness of treatment decisions and to explore psychosocial factors that influence individual prescribing choices.

Indexed as

antidepressantsCOVID-19psychopharmacologySystematic reviewUK

Identifiers

PMID41766626
PMCPMC12963840

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.