ArticleGlobal heart2026
Association Between Waist Circumference and Coronary Artery Disease: Evidence from the NHANES 1999-2023 Cross-Sectional Data and Mendelian Randomization Analysis.
Article in Global heart, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Central obesity, as indicated by waist circumference (WC), is a major risk factor for coronary artery disease (CAD). However, the independent causal role of WC in CAD remains underexplored, particularly after adjusting for metabolic comorbidities such as hypertension and diabetes. Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the causal relationship between WC and CAD using a two-pronged approach: propensity score-matched observational analysis and Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis. Methods: Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999-2023 were used for cross-sectional analysis, while genetic instrumental variables associated with WC were sourced from genome-wide association studies (GWAS). We performed inverse variance weighted (IVW) MR analysis and sensitivity tests including MR-Egger and leave-one-out analysis. Results: Propensity score matching showed that WC was significantly higher in the CAD group compared to controls ( Conclusion: Our results provide strong genetic and observational evidence linking increased WC with a higher risk of CAD. These findings highlight the need for targeted interventions to reduce central obesity and prevent CAD, especially in populations prone to metabolic disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.