Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41766792›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing2024

BMRetriever: Tuning Large Language Models as Better Biomedical Text Retrievers.

Ran Xu, Wenqi Shi, Yue Yu, Yuchen Zhuang, Yanqiao Zhu, May D Wang, Joyce C Ho, Chao Zhang, Carl Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A critical evaluation of generative query expansion on biomedical literature retrieval.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. MedAssist: LLM-Empowered Medical Assistant for Assisting the Scrutinization and Comprehension of Electronic Health Records.Proceedings of the ... International World-Wide Web Conference. International WWW Conference
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ran XuEmory University.
Wenqi ShiGeorgia Tech.
Yue YuGeorgia Tech.
Yuchen ZhuangGeorgia Tech.
Yanqiao ZhuUCLA.
May D WangGeorgia Tech.
Joyce C HoEmory University.
Chao ZhangGeorgia Tech.
Carl YangEmory University.

Funding

Understanding Diabetes Heterogeneity via Mining Multimodality Interconnected DataK25DK135913 · NIDDK · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Ji Carl Yang · 2023 to 2026
$687k
NIDDK NIH HHS K25 DK135913
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Developing effective biomedical retrieval models is important for excelling at knowledge-intensive biomedical tasks but still challenging due to the lack of sufficient publicly annotated biomedical data and computational resources. We present BMRetriever, a series of dense retrievers for enhancing biomedical retrieval via unsupervised pre-training on large biomedical corpora, followed by instruction fine-tuning on a combination of labeled datasets and synthetic pairs. Experiments on 5 biomedical tasks across 11 datasets verify BMRetriever's efficacy on various biomedical applications. BMRetriever also exhibits strong parameter efficiency, with the 410M variant outperforming baselines up to 11.7 times larger, and the 2B variant matching the performance of models with over 5B parameters. The training data and model checkpoints are released at https://huggingface.co/BMRetriever to ensure transparency, reproducibility, and application to new domains.

Identifiers

PMID41766792
PMCPMC12949633

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.