ArticleJournal of otology2026
Association between Tinnitus and Auditory Middle Latency Response: An Exploratory Study.
Article in Journal of otology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tinnitus is a concerning condition that affects most adults worldwide, with a prevalence of 6.7%. Theories of tinnitus have explained that an increase in spontaneous neural activity at the level of the thalamus could induce tinnitus. There are no standardized objective tests for tinnitus assessment because of its multifaceted nature. Hence, the current study aimed to explore the effect of Tinnitus on Latency and Amplitude of the Auditory Middle Latency Response in Audiological Attendees. The study recruited 50 individuals (25 normals and 25 individuals with tinnitus) who underwent audiological evaluations like Pure tone audiometry, immittance, pitch and loudness matching, THI and middle latency response. The IHS program was used to record MLR, which was obtained using tone burst stimuli of 500 Hz, 1 KHz, 2 KHz, and 4 KHz at a rate of 7.1/s with a constant duration of 5 ms, for a total of 1500 sweeps. As a covariate, pure tone thresholds were one of the variabilities that were addressed by ANCOVA. The amplitude of the Pa component varied significantly between the tinnitus and control groups, according to the MLR data and no other components of MLR reached that significance. Furthermore, there was no discernible variation in the latency or amplitude of MLR among any of the other components. The latency of the waveforms increased as the stimulus frequency increased. Karl Pearson correlation coefficient showed no significant correlation between THI scores and any of the outcome measures except for Pa amplitude. As the Pa component of MLR showed maximum changes between controls and individuals with tinnitus, the Pa component could be considered a potential tool for identifying neurophysiological changes related to tinnitus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.