Evidence mapPaperPMID 41767103Full record

ReviewInternational journal of breast cancer2026

A Systematic Review of Methods to Measure Adherence to Oral Anticancer Medications in African Women With Breast Cancer at Initiation, Implementation, and Discontinuation of Therapy.

Deborah Obehi Onwusah, Tafadzwa Mindu, Moses John Chimbari, Elizabeth Bolanle Ojewole

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of breast cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Deborah Obehi OnwusahDiscipline of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Health Sciences, College of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, KwaZulu-Natal Province, South Africa, ukzn.ac.za.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9246-2047
Tafadzwa MinduDiscipline of Public Health Medicine, School of Nursing and Public Health, College of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, KwaZulu-Natal Province, South Africa, ukzn.ac.za.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8244-8439
Moses John ChimbariDiscipline of Public Health Medicine, School of Nursing and Public Health, College of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, KwaZulu-Natal Province, South Africa, ukzn.ac.za.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8109-8801
Elizabeth Bolanle OjewoleDiscipline of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Health Sciences, College of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, KwaZulu-Natal Province, South Africa, ukzn.ac.za.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9589-4793

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This systematic review was aimed at assessing methods used to measure oral anticancer medication (OAM) adherence at its three phases (initiation, implementation, and discontinuation) in women with breast cancer (BC) in Africa. Methods: This review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines. Four databases were searched from 1990 to 2025 using keywords representing medication adherence, oral anticancer agents, breast cancer, measures, women, and Africa. The reporting followed the updated PRISMA guidelines. Results: All 13 studies (100%) reviewed assessed OAM adherence at the implementation phase, four studies (30.8%) at the discontinuation phase, and one study (7.7%) at the initiation phase. Persistence was also assessed in four studies (30.8%). Prescription refill records were used to measure adherence at the initiation phase. Drug assays in blood, prescription refills, pill counts, medical records reviews, and self-report measures were used during the implementation phase. Prescription refills, medical records, and self-report measures were used at the discontinuation phase. Overall, self-report measures (46.2%; Conclusions: The implementation phase was the most commonly assessed. Initiation and discontinuation phases were relatively less assessed. Self-report measures were the most frequently used, but the reliability and validity of these measures are lacking, hence limiting the evidence to guide practice. Thus, measures with sound psychometric properties, including reliability and validity, that can assess OAM adherence across its three phases are needed to improve adherence measurement and patient outcomes, particularly in Africa.

Indexed as

breast cancerdiscontinuationimplementationinitiationmeasuremedication adherenceoral antineoplastic agents

Identifiers

PMID41767103
PMCPMC12948728

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.