ArticleOpen respiratory archives
Impact-Driven Strategies for Optimizing Inhaled Therapy Adherence in COPD: The OPTIMO Delphi Consensus.
Article in Open respiratory archives. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Medication adherence is an important challenge in the management of COPD, with poor adherence negatively impacting symptom control, disease progression, and healthcare resource utilization. Objetives: This study aimed to achieve multidisciplinary consensus on practical, prioritized interventions for improving adherence and clinical results in stable COPD treatment. Material and methods: A modified Delphi study was carried out by a panel of COPD management experts to evaluate suboptimal adherence. The Delphi questionnaire, completed in two rounds, comprised 84 statements across six domains: non-adherence, its impact, contributing factors, assessment methods, improvement strategies, and prioritization. Agreement was rated using a 9-point Likert scale and consensus considered as ≥70% agreement. Results: Seventy-three multidisciplinary experts completed the questionnaire, reaching consensus on 74 of 84 statements. The panel identified high-impact, easy-to-implement interventions, culminating in a practical decalogue for optimizing inhalation therapy. Two key strategies were emphasized: simplifying and unifying inhalation regimens, and empowering patients. While all adherence assessment tools were considered useful, only digital and automated methods were deemed feasible in routine practice. Treatment optimization was also associated with reducing inhalation frequency by using long-acting molecules, and tailoring device selection to patient capacity. Conclusion: The resulting decalogue provides structured expert guidance for healthcare professionals, highlighting once-daily dosing, simplified devices, and patient engagement as the interventions considered most likely to improve adherence in COPD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.