Evidence mapPaperPMID 41767188Full record

ArticleOpen respiratory archives

Impact-Driven Strategies for Optimizing Inhaled Therapy Adherence in COPD: The OPTIMO Delphi Consensus.

Bernardino Alcázar Navarrete, María Belén Alonso Ortiz, Esperanza Doña Díaz, José María Echave-Sustaeta María-Tomé, Pedro Gargantilla Madera, Cruz González Villaescusa, José David Maya Viejo, Fernando María Navarro Ros, Eva Trillo Calvo, Miguel Turegano-Yedro and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open respiratory archives. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Bernardino Alcázar NavarreteDepartment of Medicine, University of Granada, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, IBS - Granada, Granada, Spain.
María Belén Alonso OrtizDoctor Negrín University Hospital of Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain.
Esperanza Doña DíazRegional University Hospital of Malaga, Málaga, Spain.
José María Echave-Sustaeta María-ToméQuiron Health Hospital, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Sports, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Pedro Gargantilla MaderaEl Escorial Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Cruz González VillaescusaUniversity Clinical Hospital of Valencia, INCLIVA Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain.
José David Maya ViejoClinical Management Unit of Camas, Sevilla, Spain.
Fernando María Navarro RosCentro de Salud Plaza Segovia, Departamento H. Peset, Clininav SLP, Valencia, Spain.
Eva Trillo CalvoCampo de Belchite Health Center, Primary Care, Aragon Institute for Health Research (IIS Aragón), Zaragoza, Spain.
Miguel Turegano-YedroHealth Center Casar of Cáceres, Cáceres, Spain.
Alfonso Martínez FerrerasMedical Affairs, GSK, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Medication adherence is an important challenge in the management of COPD, with poor adherence negatively impacting symptom control, disease progression, and healthcare resource utilization. Objetives: This study aimed to achieve multidisciplinary consensus on practical, prioritized interventions for improving adherence and clinical results in stable COPD treatment. Material and methods: A modified Delphi study was carried out by a panel of COPD management experts to evaluate suboptimal adherence. The Delphi questionnaire, completed in two rounds, comprised 84 statements across six domains: non-adherence, its impact, contributing factors, assessment methods, improvement strategies, and prioritization. Agreement was rated using a 9-point Likert scale and consensus considered as ≥70% agreement. Results: Seventy-three multidisciplinary experts completed the questionnaire, reaching consensus on 74 of 84 statements. The panel identified high-impact, easy-to-implement interventions, culminating in a practical decalogue for optimizing inhalation therapy. Two key strategies were emphasized: simplifying and unifying inhalation regimens, and empowering patients. While all adherence assessment tools were considered useful, only digital and automated methods were deemed feasible in routine practice. Treatment optimization was also associated with reducing inhalation frequency by using long-acting molecules, and tailoring device selection to patient capacity. Conclusion: The resulting decalogue provides structured expert guidance for healthcare professionals, highlighting once-daily dosing, simplified devices, and patient engagement as the interventions considered most likely to improve adherence in COPD.

Indexed as

Adherence assessment toolsCOPD adherenceDelphi methodInhaled therapy optimizationOnce-daily dosing

Identifiers

PMID41767188
PMCPMC12936937

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.