Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41767362›Full record

ArticleHealth science reports2026

Subjective Evaluation of Denture Adhesives in Mandibular Complete Denture Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Afsheen Maqsood, Wan Nazatul Shima Shahidan, Maria Shakoor Abbasi, Asra Salahuddin, Gotam Das, Naseer Ahmed, Artak Heboyan

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05063422 (Retentive Strength of Various Dental Adhesives on Various Types of Residual Ridged), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05063422 phase1completednot on this map

Retentive Strength of Various Dental Adhesives on Various Types of Residual Ridged

TypeinterventionalSponsorAltamash Institute of Dental MedicineRan2022 to 2023Enrolled24ConditionsRetentive Strength of Denture AdhesivesArmspolymyxin b/trimethoprim ophthalmic, Carboxymethyl cellulose
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Afsheen MaqsoodDepartment of Oral Pathology Bahria University Dental College Karachi Pakistan.
Wan Nazatul Shima ShahidanDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Medical Sciences, Health Campus Universiti Sains Malaysia Kota Bharu Kelantan Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1702-2973
Maria Shakoor AbbasiDepartment of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Medical University Islamabad Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2050-0988
Asra SalahuddinDepartment of Prosthodontics Altamash Institute of Dental Medicine Karachi Pakistan.
Gotam DasDepartment of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry King Khalid University Abha Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9506-6456
Naseer AhmedDepartment of Prosthodontics Altamash Institute of Dental Medicine Karachi Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0960-1123
Artak HeboyanDepartment of Research Analytics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences Saveetha University Chennai India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8329-3205

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Edentulism significantly affects oral function and quality of life, particularly among mandibular complete denture wearers, where reduced retention and stability remain common clinical challenges. Denture adhesives are frequently recommended as adjuncts to improve denture performance; however, limited randomized controlled trials have compared different adhesive forms using standardized control conditions. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the short-term subjective effects of cream, powder, and strip-type denture adhesives on satisfaction and functional outcomes in mandibular complete denture wearers. Methods: This randomized controlled trial included 240 completely edentulous participants aged 40-70 years with moderately resorbed mandibular ridges. Participants were randomly allocated into four groups ( Results: All adhesive types demonstrated significantly higher satisfaction, improved chewing ability, greater retention, and enhanced comfort compared with the control group ( Conclusion: All adhesive types significantly improve short-term satisfaction, mastication, retention, and comfort in mandibular complete denture wearers. Improvements in speaking ability were observed with cream and strip adhesives only, while denture cleanliness or adhesive removal from dentures remained comparable across all groups. Trial Registration: The study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (first submitted date: June 24, 2021; identifier number: NCT05063422) and approved by the ethical review committee of Altamash Institute of Dental Medicine, Pakistan (AIDM/RDRC/01/2021/03).

Indexed as

biomechanicscomfortcomplete denturesdenture cleaningdenture satisfactionretention

Identifiers

PMID41767362
PMCPMC12935763

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.