ArticlePatient preference and adherence2026
Adherence to Pediatric Ophthalmology Follow-Up After Completion of Retinopathy of Prematurity: A Retrospective Review.
Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Retinopathy of prematurity is a leading cause of preventable childhood vision loss, and infants remain at risk of long-term ocular complications even after ROP screening concludes. However, adherence to recommended pediatric ophthalmology follow-up after ROP screening completion is not well characterized. This study aimed to evaluate adherence to pediatric ophthalmology follow-up visits after completion of ROP screening and identify factors associated with loss to follow-up in a tertiary care setting. Patients and Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of premature infants eligible for ROP screening at a single urban academic center between January 2018 and December 2021. All infants were screened by a single vitreoretinal specialist, with pediatric ophthalmology follow-up recommended at the time of ROP clearance within 4 to 6 months. The primary outcome was a documented follow-up visit with pediatric ophthalmology. Demographic, perinatal, and ROP-related factors were compared between those who did and did not follow up, using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Results: Of 475 eligible infants, 223 (46.9%) completed at least one pediatric ophthalmology follow-up appointment. In multivariate analysis, outpatient discharge from ROP care (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.45-0.97, p = 0.035) and higher gestational age (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.84-1.00, p = 0.041) were significantly associated with lower adherence to follow-up. Timing of follow-up (pre-COVID-19 vs COVID-19 era), insurance status, race, ethnicity, number of comorbidities, and distance to the clinic were not significantly associated with follow-up adherence. Conclusion: Fewer than half of infants completed their recommended pediatric ophthalmology follow-up appointments after ROP screening completion. Lower adherence among infants discharged from outpatient ROP care and those born at higher gestational ages highlights a critical care transition from ROP screening to pediatric ophthalmology. Interventions such as scheduling follow-up appointments prior to discharge and improving caregiver education may enhance continuity of care and reduce preventable vision loss in this vulnerable population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.