ArticleDigital health
Establishment and effectiveness of a community self-management intervention model for patients with chronic pulmonary heart disease: A prospective observational study.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chronic cor pulmonale (CCP) represents a considerable health burden globally, especially in community settings where resources for management are frequently constrained. Objective: This study aims to establish an internet-based integrated healthcare and prevention self-management intervention model for community-dwelling patients with CCP (pulmonary heart disease) and to evaluate its effectiveness in improving disease management and health outcomes. Methods: Patients diagnosed with CCP within a community setting were enrolled. According to the management strategies they actually received, they were categorized into an intervention group and a control group. The intervention group received an internet-based integrated healthcare and prevention self-management intervention, while the control group received conventional management. The duration of the intervention was six months. Changes in the dyspnea index, oxygen saturation, quality of life scores, and readmission rates were measured before and after the intervention. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS version 21.0. Results: Compared to the control group, the intervention group exhibited significant improvements in the dyspnea index, oxygen saturation, and quality of life scores ( Conclusion: The internet-based integrated healthcare and prevention self-management intervention model demonstrated significant effectiveness in enhancing self-management capacity and overall health status among community-dwelling patients with CCP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.