ArticleBiomedical optics express2025
Machine learning-based method to detect capillary stalling using optical coherence tomography.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Capillary stalling has emerged as an important mechanistic and potential therapeutic target in mouse models of several neurological disorders. Time-series optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) has been used to rapidly detect capillary stalling over hundreds of capillaries in 3D and can be used to study this phenomenon in a research setting. However, existing methods for quantifying capillary stalls are labor-intensive, prone to errors, and may be limited by their reliance on 2D representations of inherently 3D data. To address these limitations, we developed a computational approach based on a support vector machine (SVM) trained on engineered features pertaining to OCTA time-series data. When evaluated with 4-fold cross-validation, the final classifier achieved a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area under the curve (AUC) of .978 (baseline: 0.5) and a precision-recall (PR) AUC of .700 (baseline: 0.013). It also reduced the amount of time required to annotate from 1 hour to 22 minutes per dataset and detected an average of 8.1 stalling segments in each dataset that were missed by expert annotations, which amounted to 26% of all stalling segments. To demonstrate the utility of our tool, we measured the morphological properties of capillaries and found that stalling segments are significantly smaller in diameter, more tortuous, and longer than non-stalling segments. These findings highlight the algorithm's potential to uncover morphological patterns associated with stalling and facilitate comparative studies across experimental conditions. To support further research, the tool is freely available as open-source software for use by the scientific community.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.