ArticleBiomedical optics express2025
A-scan sequence transformers for palpation with optical coherence elastography.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recognizing the properties of elastic tissue can facilitate surgical navigation, e.g., when localizing lesions by palpation. However, palpation is very subjective and often unavailable in minimally invasive surgery. High-speed optical coherence elastography (OCE) adapted for intraoperative use could enable elasticity estimation by measuring the propagation of mechanically stimulated waves. However, robust estimation of wave velocity can be challenging, and reconstruction of the elastic modulus is highly dependent on the correct modeling of wave propagation. We therefore consider deep learning for the end-to-end estimation of elasticity from OCE phase data. Since optical coherence tomography inherently produces a temporal sequence of one-dimensional axial scans (A-scans), we consider transformer-based deep learning models to directly process A-scan sequences. For homogeneous tissue phantoms with known elastic properties, we obtain a mean error of 1.64 kPa, which significantly improves elasticity reconstruction compared to conventional processing and the best CNN-based approach with 7.80 kPa and 5.55 kPa, respectively. Furthermore, we demonstrate generalization to heterogeneous phantoms with inclusions and assess the elasticity of soft tissue samples, including heart, kidney, and liver. The results show that transformer architectures are well suited for reconstructing elasticity from A-scan sequences in OCE.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.