ArticleInternational journal of dentistry2026
Professionalism and e-Professionalism From Dentists' Perspective: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in International journal of dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Professionalism and e-Professionalism From Dentists' Perspective: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of dentistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to investigate professionalism and e-professionalism from the perspectives of students and dentists in multiregional countries (Saudi, Iraq, and Jordan). Methods: Data were collected using a self-administered questionnaire that investigated professionalism from students' and dentists' perspectives in multiregional countries (Saudi, Iraq, and Jordan). Participants were asked specific questions regarding sociodemographic factors, including gender, region, age, educational level, years of experience, and work sector, and questions about professionalism, including professional attitude and behavior, ethics and jurisprudence, consciousness, communication, and interpersonal skills, quality of life and personal satisfaction, and e-professionalism. The questionnaire was scored with participants' answers following an agreement scale, from strongly agree to strongly disagree. The data from 292 participants (91 males and 201 females) were collected and analyzed using SPSS computer software. Statistical significance was considered at 95% confidence intervals and a two-tailed Results: The results showed that participants from Jordan and Saudi Arabia were more aware of the meaning and aspects of professionalism and thought that professionalism should be included as part of the undergraduate curriculum than were participants from Iraq ( Conclusions: The regional differences in awareness and attitudes toward professionalism among dental professionals and students from Jordan, Iraq, and Saudi Arabia were highlighted, and notably, Jordanian and Saudi participants demonstrated higher levels of professionalism than the participants from Iraq. Factors such as age, gender, work sector, and nationality significantly influenced professionalism, with older professionals, females, and those in the private sector generally scoring higher. The study also highlighted uniformly high communication skills across regions and variations in e-professionalism scores. It was also emphasized that sociocultural factors contributed to improved quality of life and personal satisfaction in Jordan and Iraq.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.