ArticleJournal of pain research2026
Cervical Rotation-Traction Manipulation of Different Treatment Frequency in Cervical Radiculopathy: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.
Article in Journal of pain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06320249 (Rotation-traction Manipulation of Different Treatment Frequency in Cervical Radiculopathy), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Rotation-traction Manipulation of Different Treatment Frequency in Cervical Radiculopathy: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Cervical radiculopathy (CR) poses a significant challenge due to its debilitating impact. Cervical rotation-traction manipulation (CRTM) is a representative manual therapy of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) in China, which is beneficial to improve the pain, numbness, and dysfunction of CR patients. However, the optimal treatment frequency for CRTM remains systematically underexplored in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). This clinical study aims to assess the effectiveness and safety on three sessions per week of CRTM (TSWM) compared to one session per week of CRTM (OSWM) and cervical traction (CT) in patients with CR. Patients and Methods: This multicenter, three-arm, prospective RCT is conducted at four hospitals in China. Participants will be randomly allocated in a 1:1:1 ratio to one of the TSWM group, OSWM group, or CT group through the central randomization system. All participants will receive 4-week treatment and 16-week follow-up (total 20 weeks). The primary outcome is pain intensity of neck and arm measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at week 4. The secondary outcomes include VAS for pain intensity, VAS for numbness intensity, Neck Disability Index (NDI), Short Form 12 (SF-12), the total cost, the recurrence rate, and Expectation of Treatment and Credibility Scale (ETCS). Adverse events (AEs) will be monitored and reported throughout the trial. Conclusion: We expect this clinical study to evaluate the optimal frequency of CRTM for CR. It will also serve as a reference and exploration for investigating the dose-response relationship of manual therapy. Trial Registration: This clinical trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (registration number: NCT06320249) on March 15, 2024.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.