ReviewBiochemistry research international2026
Gene Expression, Docking and Machine Learning in Malaria Drug Discovery: A Systematic Review.
Review in Biochemistry research international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Malaria remains a significant and worldwide health threat with increasing resistance to current treatments, stimulating the demand for innovative approaches in pursuing drug discovery. This systematic review integrates the progress made from 2014 through 2024 regarding molecular methods like gene expression profiling, molecular docking and machine learning to understand the biology of Methodology: Several studies were found using a PRISMA-guided search of PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science (64 studies found). The data extracted were gene expression outcomes, docking affinities, ML models and experimental validations (in vitro/in vivo). Results: Molecular docking emerged as the dominant technique (32.37%), followed by in vitro antiplasmodial assays (14.39%), ADMET profiling (10.79%) and gene expression studies (3.60%). RNA-seq analysis revealed key host and parasite genes modulated by herbal treatments, including those involved in apoptosis and inflammation. Notably, compounds like isorhamnetin and myricetin 3-O-glucoside showed exceptionally high binding affinities to Conclusion: Multiomics, docking and ML integration improve the target identification and prioritise the compounds. This review illustrates the great potential of molecular techniques for the development of drugs against antimalarial helicases that are not resistant to drug therapy. However, in vivo data holes and methodology inconsistency limit clinical translation. Future work should include standardisation of protocols and studies of synergistic combinations of phytochemicals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.