ArticleMethodsX2026
Assessing personality profile: A qualitative study from drug abuse rehabilitation policies.
Article in MethodsX, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mental Readiness of Clients and Families Before Discharge From Drug Rehabilitation: Protocol for a Qualitative Study.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article outlines a qualitative methodological framework for evaluating personality profiles within drug abuse rehabilitation systems and policy environments. The protocol combines expert-led Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) with a systematic analysis of social research inquiry (Litmas) documents to assess psychosocial risk and protective factors associated with recovery processes. Eight experts from psychiatry, psychology, correctional facilities, and national substance abuse rehabilitation policy participated in the focus group discussions. Thematic analysis was carried out to guarantee analytical transparency and cross-source triangulation. The protocol showcases how psychosocial characteristics can be systematically connected to rehabilitation practices and policy execution across health and correctional systems. This approach aims to assist in assessing the quality of rehabilitation programs and inform policy decisions based on evidence, especially in settings involving multiple sectors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.