ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2026
Temporal gradient analysis of blood glucose responses to non-standard physical activity: a free-living study in type 1 diabetes.
Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Daily physical activity (PA) impacts blood glucose (BG) in individuals with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM), with effects varying by intensity, duration, and timing. Predicting BG changes during free-living activity remains challenging but may help prevent hypoglycaemia. Previous studies have focused on the impact of PA on BG levels, but only during exercise sessions, not throughout the entire day. Methods: Using retrospective data from eight individuals with T1DM (mean age 67 years; 3 female, 5 male), we analysed whether non-standard PA, defined as activity exceeding the individual's mean habitual level in a preceding interval, was associated with steeper downward trends in BG. PA was quantified using wrist-worn accelerometry, and BG responses were analysed using gradient-based methods across 20, 40, and 60 min time windows. Results: Two hypotheses were evaluated. Hypothesis 1 assessed whether BG decline intensified during existing downward trends and achieved an accuracy above 83.33%, with F1-scores exceeding 0.83 at shorter intervals. Hypothesis 2 examined BG declines following prior increases and showed greater variability; accuracy ranged from 73.53% to 88.33%, with the lowest F1-score of 0.75 at the 60 min window. Conclusion: We have found a reliable correlation between increased levels of PA and BG levels under free-living conditions. These findings establish a foundation for future work aimed at quantifying BG responses to PA and developing personalised decision-support tools for insulin or carbohydrate adjustment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.