ArticleRadiology case reports2026
Article in Radiology case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gastric-type endocervical adenocarcinoma (G-EAC) is an uncommon human-papillomavirus-independent cervical malignancy that frequently presents with non-specific symptoms and carries a high risk of peritoneal dissemination. A 52-year-old postmenopausal woman presented with 10 days of spontaneous, irregular, vaginal bleeding of moderate volume. She denied abdominal pain, tenesmus, or constitutional symptoms. Tumor markers showed elevation of CA-125 (212.37 U/mL) and CA-199 (1793.93 U/mL). The patient underwent MRI examination, which showed isointense signal intensity on T1-weighted imaging (T1WI) and slightly higher signal intensity on T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) in the cervix, with a size of approximately 49 mm × 45 mm × 48 mm. The boundary with the adjacent uterine cavity was unclear, suggesting a cervical tumor lesion. The patient underwent further PET/CT examination, which revealed a soft-tissue cervical mass with mild to moderate
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.